I wanted to reply to this because nobody seems to be paying attention to what 
Mary Lou actually says:

I am appealing to the collective wisdom of the list!  I am helping a dance 
professor put together an online course on the history of dance.  She is using 
multiple library resources - some will be entire programs with permissions, 
some will be entire programs with licensing fees, and others will be fair use 
excerpts.

So she is saying that there are 3 categories of items to be used:
Entire programs WITH PERMISSIONS
Entire programs WITH LICENSING FEES
Fair use EXCERPTS.

This has nothing to do with streaming an entire program without 
permissions/licensing. Mary Lou seems to have a clear grasp of the difference 
between a legal and an illegal copy. The question is whether she can use a 
lawfully acquired (i.e. not taped off TV) copy that does not belong to the 
library as the basis of digital materials for educational purposes.

My thought is this: she needs to specify when she asks for the permissions and 
licensing fees for the entire programs whether the library can use a 
privately-purchased copy as the basis for the digital version. In the case of 
the items she describes, where she has permission, surely she could ask the 
same source for permission to use the instructor's copy.

But with respect to the clips, which would be governed by fair use, surely the 
Rulemaking of 2009, which Gary was so instrumental in obtaining, would be a 
useful guide:

Motion pictures on DVDs that are lawfully made and acquired and that are 
protected by the Content Scrambling System when circumvention is accomplished 
solely in order to accomplish the incorporation of short portions of motion 
pictures into new works for the purpose of criticism or comment, and where the 
person engaging in circumvention believes and has reasonable grounds for 
believing that circumvention is necessary to fulfill the purpose of the use in 
the following instances:

(i)  Educational uses by college and university professors and by college and 
university film and media studies students; (2 other situations)
http://www.copyright.gov/1201/2010/

By way of contrast with the rulemaking of 2006,  where it was specified that 
clips can be made only from "Audiovisual works included in the educational 
library of a college or university's film or media studies department," this 
pronouncement does not specify that the work has to belong to the educational 
institution. So it seems to me that an instructor's personal copy would be an 
appropriate source for "short portions."

Judy Shoaf

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to