Ah, hah! OK, it's back to the dictionaries for me -- thanks for the 
distinction. I like this kind of thing!! "from absurdity," I guess. 




============== 
Randal 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Dennis Doros" <[email protected]> 
To: "Video Library questions" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 8:57:58 PM 
Subject: Re: [Videolib] "just download it anyways" article 



Randal, reductio ad absurdum is taking a position and drawing it to an absurd 
conclusion. Much of Colbert's comedy is a perfect and wonderful example. 


I believe Ab absurdum is proving a position's truth based on an absurd reality. 



Best regards, 
Dennis Doros 
Milestone Film & Video 
PO Box 128 / Harrington Park, NJ 07640 
Phone: 201-767-3117 / Fax: 201-767-3035 / Email: [email protected] 


Visit our main website! www.milestonefilms.com 
Visit our new websites! www.mspresents.com , www.portraitofjason.com , 
www.shirleyclarkefilms.com , 
To see or download our 2014 Video Catalog, click here ! 






Support "Milestone Film" on Facebook and Twitter ! 





See the website: Association of Moving Image Archivists and like them on 
Facebook 
AMIA 2014 Conference, Savannah, Georgia, October 8-11, 2014 


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Randal Baier < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>


I think Dennis means "reductio ad absurdum," but who's counting? And for that 
matter, fish need no bicycles. 

Medici.tv, Naxos music library, classical music.com (?) ... They all have good 
licensed products, not cheap, but workable for "lending." Maybe the iTunes 
issue really boils down to sheer profit potential ... Katy Perry dressed up as 
Madame Butterfly makes millions, one track a a time. Mme. BFly at Glyndebourne 
does not. Although given the latest production of MB I might be proven wrong! 




----- Reply message ----- 
From: "Jessica Rosner" < [email protected] > 
To: < [email protected] > 
Subject: [Videolib] "just download it anyways" article 
Date: Thu, Jul 31, 2014 5:41 pm 








I have no idea of the language but it is a very different situation. There is 
no contract or license when you buy a standard Hollywood DVD. It is physical 
item covered by standard copyright laws including "face to face" I don't belong 
iTunes or any downloading service for music of film but know they have specific 
terms that you have to agree to when you join and this would constitute a 
contract which can have terms that restrict what a user can do and those rules 
can go well beyond what is permitted by copyright law. Basically iTunes can 
indeed put in all kinds of restrictions which the buyer is legally obliged to 
follow. Not that everyone does but libraries far more than individuals could 
get in serious trouble if they did not. This is why I think the goal should be 
do negotiate with rights holders and explain libraries need for physical copies 
or at least something that can be lent and used under "face to face" 




On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Matt Ball < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>


I'm curious about the "personal use" laguage in the license from iTunes that 
Mr. Smith refers to several times. Most Hollywood DVDs come with personal use 
licenses and libraries have been collecting and lending them for years. I 
wonder how the iTunes license is different. I read it rather thoroughly last 
year and it seemed somewhat vague in certain key areas, but my memory isn't 
what is ever way, and I don't have the license right here in front of me. 

Matt 




[email protected] writes: 
And I agree with you but one note I was definitely also attacking Mr.Smith's 
total disregard for copyright LAW not just his morality or ethics. He basically 
belongs to the " we academic institutions are above those evil copyright laws 
and all rights holders are greedy pigs so we should not pay them" school of 
thought. I particularly liked his write up of Georgia State Appeal in which he 
said three federal judges did not understand copyright law and were totally 
misinterpreting it. Evidently he knows more than they do about copyright law. 


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Dennis Doros < [email protected] > wrote: 



Okay, here's where I almost entirely agree with Jessica. To me, this "other" 
Kevin (this one ain't from Jersey) Smith's article has nothing to do with 
copyright and library's rights, but an internet illness based on utopian 
expectations leading to faulty thinking. Jessica's argument, however, doesn't 
take into account that this guy's reasoning has a fatal flaw past the morality 
and ethics of it. 


I dislike this article intensely by Smith because like most articles of this 
nature, it takes a specific case and blows it up from the ab absurdo (I believe 
my memory of Latin is correct) to a blanket conclusion. In other words, because 
you can't download one item, you should be able to download all items. What's 
the percentage of material out there that libraries can't buy in a more stable, 
higher quality format, ie. CDs. 


It's a very common disease in the digital age to insist that everything HAS to 
be available. It should be and maybe it will be one day, but that will take 
time, legislation and energy -- as well as increased taxes to support the arts. 


Rather than support the illegal download of copyrighted material, the real 
obvious conclusion is that the ALA should work with Itunes to come up with a 
secondary system for libraries that's fair and equitable. That's a huge amount 
of business they could have. 



Best regards, 
Dennis Doros 
Milestone Film & Video 
PO Box 128 / Harrington Park, NJ 07640 
Phone: 201-767-3117 / Fax: 201-767-3035 / Email: [email protected] 

Visit our main website! www.milestonefilms.com 
Visit our new websites! www.mspresents.com , www.portraitofjason.com , 
www.shirleyclarkefilms.com , 
To see or download our 2014 Video Catalog, click here ! 



Support "Milestone Film" on Facebook and Twitter ! 



See the website: Association of Moving Image Archivists and like them on 
Facebook 
AMIA 2014 Conference, Savannah, Georgia, October 8-11, 2014 


On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Laura Jenemann < [email protected] > wrote: 



Dear videolib, 

A recent post from Kevin Smith (Duke’s Scholarly Communication Officer) on 
digital-only music, and what libraries might or might not do about it: 
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2014/07/28/planning-for-musical-obsolescence/
 

Here are some comments that may resonate with media librarians: 

“At a recent consultation to discuss this problem, it was interesting to note 
that several of the lawyers in the room encouraged the librarians to just 
download the music anyway and ignore the licensing terms, simply treating this 
piece of music like any other library acquisition. Their argument was that 
iTunes and the LA Philharmonic really do not mean to prevent library 
acquisitions; they are just using a boilerplate license without full awareness 
of the impact of its terms. But the librarians were unwilling.” 

Regards, 
Laura 

Laura Jenemann 
Film Studies/Media Services Librarian 
George Mason University 
703-993-7593 
[email protected] 



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors. 





VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors. 






___________________ 
Matt Ball 
Director, Woodruff Library 
Pace Academy 
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd. 
Atlanta, GA 30327 
[email protected] 

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors. 


</blockquote>


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors. 


</blockquote>


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors. 

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to