Our present philosophy is still to attempt to build a permanent, physical 
collection.  We frankly do not have the budget to support a lot of streamed 
access and recognize the "more bang for your buck" aspect of purchasing 
physical DVDs, as opposed to paying for a semester's access or 3-year access to 
a streamed video.

If faculty had their way, we would do both.  Several profs have greatly enjoyed 
Swank's streamed feature film service, even though we typically own the same 
films in physical copies.  Part of that relates to what Jane mentioned:  a 
preference to preserve classroom time for other activities and having students 
screen films on their own.   However, the almighty dollar continues to 
demonstrate its almightiness, and they're having to forfeit convenience for the 
wider, longer-lasting access that purchasing DVDs provides.  The classroom 
reserve system may be antiquated, but it still works quite nicely. ;)

As to equipment to support the old-fashioned formats, I tend to pipe up loudly 
and fairly frequently, hoping that the Powers That Be are listening and 
recognize the NEED to continue to offer support for the physical collection.  
Yes, the day will come when none - or nearly none - of the VCRs on campus are 
operational; yes, the day will come when several of our DVD players go on the 
fritz.  However, given budgetary realities, our IT department is going to have 
to do what it can to continue to support our physical collection, since we 
don't have the resources to make the switch to streamed video.

Just one small-school perspective.
Susan

Susan Albrecht
Library Media Acquisitions Manager
Graduate Fellowship Advisor
Wabash College Lilly Library
765-361-6216 (acquisitions)
765-361-6297 (fellowships)
765-361-6295 fax
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.facebook.com/wabashcollegelibrary.films<http://www.facebook.com/wabashcollegelibrary.films>
http://pinterest.com/wabashcolllib/

*******************************************************************
"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice." --Neil Peart
*******************************************************************

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hutchison, Jane
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 9:37 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Future of educational media distribution - 
institutional obsolescence

deg and I did not survey classroom management folks in particular, though some 
of the respondents did both classroom support and purchasing of media, such as 
myself.  We sent out to  the CCUMC listserv as well as others that hit media 
professionals, acquisitions, collection development and directors of small 
institutions who handled these responsibilities.

What may be interesting is in future purchases.  For instance, if we have a 
choice at William Paterson, we will just purchase streaming and no physical 
copy.  So we are moving in that direction and more and more titles are becoming 
available for streaming.  Our physical collection circulation is going down 
drastically, while our streaming circulation is increasing dramatically.  
Faculty prefer to use class time for discussion, active learning, rather than 
passively sit and watch a whole film.  The faculty member often as a follow up, 
may show a brief clip for emphasize, but they do prefer having students view 
the titles on their own.  This is becoming a model that called the "flipped 
classroom."

So who's on first?  Does the classroom technology determine what is purchased, 
or do collection managers determine what media format is purchased.  Or is it 
faculty who determine what format they use?  We have faculty at WPU who only 
want streaming and we have others who prefer the physical copy, but that latter 
request is coming less and less.

Regards, Jane

Jane B. Hutchison
Associate Director
Instruction & Research Technology
300 Pompton Road
Wayne, NJ 07470
(w)973-720-2980
(cell) 973-418-7727



From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of scott spicer
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 9:04 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [Videolib] Future of educational media distribution - institutional 
obsolescence

Andrew,
Yes, I agree we should be surveying classroom management professionals to get 
our fingers on the pulse of future institutional physical media classroom 
support.  Of all the research topics we have discussed, this one may be the 
most pressing!  I will follow up with you offline to discuss further, pending 
deg's response.
deg: in your study with Jane did you survey classroom management folks on their 
plans for future classroom physical media playback support?  If not, are you 
(or is anyone else here) aware of a relatively recent study that has?  I will 
also research the higher ed. a/v support/educational technologist literature to 
see if this issue has been tackled elsewhere.
Thanks,
Scott

PS:  If the classroom player issue isn't enough, heightened federal regulations 
for disabled access to online educational materials (equal access to digitally 
delivered format) is probably not too far behind.  See yesterday's piece in the 
Chronicle 
(http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/for-bill-on-disabled-access-to-online-teaching-materials-the-devils-in-the-details/54651)
 on the proposed Technology, Equality, and Accessibility in College and Higher 
Education Act (HR 3505) 
(https://www.congress.gov/113/bills/hr3505/BILLS-113hr3505ih.pdf).
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to