>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Diekhans <[email protected]> writes:
> John Stoffel <[email protected]> writes: >> Maybe tag main with 'vm-8.3.0a' then? Get more people testing and >> more releases happening. I'll get to testing later this week. > I was never clear if the `a' and `b' were alpha and beta or something > else in the LP releases. I agree. > Allowing for only one alpha seems wrong. Agree. > I come from old-school, with a release branch being made and going > through alpha and beta releases with tags marking them. Agree. > Although, many git projects have moved away from this and keep > main branch release-quality and just cut releases off of it. > This seems attractive. Ideally... but then we need to put some tags on our main branch as well, and there are none, at least not when I last looked a few days ago. > We can discuss this and look for examples. Right now, lets get main > to something we think is approaching release quality. So we already have some known issues, and I'm trying to cut down my .vm file to see if I can replicate it, but in general VM is a bit noiser in the status line, especially about: Attributes updates on X messages which shows up *all* the time. But doesn't seem to be useful to know about, since they don't seem to be saved any where, since if you save a mailbox and immediately re-visit it, it's still saying "updating attributes..." which is just annoying.
