Ivan Bjerre Damgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Isn't a mail list for patches a strange place to put something like > this El Gamal protocol you just mailed about? If you had not "by > chance" sent this to more people, you might not have received > Claudio's useful comment.
You're right, I'm pretty sure Claudio would never have known about the ElGamal or the Paillier runtimes otherwise... > Maybe there should be a "protocol development" mail list? I think of this list as the general development list and so also the protocol development list. I got the idea for a separate more code-heavy list since I believe many people wont bother reading code posted here anyway. And I also got the impression that people would hold back with sending in patches since they did not want to disturb the others reading this list. But maybe it's a bad idea to split the attention like that... people interested in VIFF will now sort of have to be part of both lists to be updated with everything that is going on in VIFF. What do people think about this? -- Martin Geisler _______________________________________________ viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/) [email protected] http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk
