.. that is interesting - would the carrier of this gene have recognised another "spot on'er" in earlier times?
--- Monica Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Interesting, although I have never quite understood > why so much importance > is attached to it today. It is not necessarily an > indication of musical > ability. > > I wonder if people had perfect pitch in the 16th and > 17th centuries - when > there was no absolute fixed pitch and the names of > the notes were not fixed > either. > > Monica > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "bill kilpatrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:59 PM > Subject: [VIHUELA] perfect pitch > > > > > http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070827/en_nm/gene_pitch_dc > > > > "... it ain't me, etc. - i'm not the fortunate > one, no." > > > > http://billkilpatrickhaiku.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there > knows the answer. Try > > it > > now. > > http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > > > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > http://billkilpatrickhaiku.blogspot.com/ ___________________________________________________________ Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
