----- Original Message -----
From: bill kilpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, January 26, 2008 10:36 am
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: contributions to this list

> unnhhhh ... arrrghhhhh ... uunnnhhhh ...
> 
> seriously, i suspect there will be more contributing to the list 
> if those involved in the wider vihuela tradition were encouraged 
> to do so.  the nuance and understanding of a player born and 
> raised in this tradition will surely have a positive, lively 
> effect on all - no matter what their vihuela might be called.

At the heart, these Dartmouth lists are focused on early music and/or early 
instruments or reproductions of known early instrumental concepts.  I don't 
think there's any resistance to discussion that intersects either old 
instruments (like chitarrino, gittern, citole, or anything else 
not-quite-vihuela of a known period provenance) or early music (like Le Roy, 
Mudarra, de Murcia, Canova da Milano, etc.).  I suspect Mudarra on charango or 
post-Piazzolla Argentine tango on a deliberate reproduction of medieval citole 
iconography would probably draw a small amount of insightful response.  
Certainly, your early discussions of the conceptual origins of charango drew a 
great deal of conversation.  It only stalled after it was continuously recycled 
and drifted from direct connection to extant early instruments.

I really enjoy things like your Burns settings on charango, Bill, but 
discussion of them here isn't necessarily any more on-topic than most of what 
goes down on that wacky Yahoo "Fretted Friends" list.  There are, of course, 
places where such chat is more at home.  I don't discuss modern mandolin or 
guitar music here, although I am really involved with such stuff.  Rather than 
sullenly stew upon what this list isn't, I carry those topics to where such 
chat is more at home.

Best,
Eugene



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to