Dear Monica,
   There are many schemes for designating the various octaves of musical
   pitch.
   See _New_HDM_, page 640, bottom of the first column.
   CC indicates the C with two ledger lines below the bass clef, C the C
   in the
   bass clef and c as middle C, octave above that c', then c" etc.
   It is a system of indicating pitch used by English organ builders and
   dates
   back to 1519.  (See _New_Grove_, "pitch nomenclature," Example 1/2.)
   Sounds like a system that
   the Galpin Society would use in their publications.
   Lute News hasn't reached me yet, so you've piqued my curiosity.
   Arthur.
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: "Monica Hall" <[1][email protected]>
   To: "Vihuelalist" <[2][email protected]>
   Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 6:52 AM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Arch-cittern
   >   Those of you who belong to the Lute Society will have received the
   >   latest number of Lute News. (Apologies to those of you who aren't
   >   members).   This has a reproduction of the portrait of the actress
   >   Dorothy Jordan playing an arch-cittern - which looks a bit
   >   like an English guitar with additional diapasons.   There is a
   >   commentary by Peter Holman.
   >
   >
   >
   >   There are one or two things which I think experts on these
   instruments
   >   might be able to clarify for me.
   >
   >
   >
   >   The first of these is where he mentions the possibility that the
   colour
   >   coded strings are harp strings and then says "this would mean that
   >   Jordan tuned them in a diatonic sequence rising from CC.
   >
   >
   >
   >   According to both the Oxford Concise and Harvard Dictionaries there
   is
   >   no such thing as CC.   C alone would indicate that the lowest
   diapason
   >   was tuned to the note C below the bass clef - i.e. with 2 leger
   >   lines.   C1 is an octave below that which seems a bit unlikely.
   >
   >
   >
   >   So what is the lowest note?   Is "CC" a misprint for "C".
   >
   >
   >
   >   The other question is about the music on p.7.   I'm assuming that
   both
   >   parts are supposed to be played on a single instrument.   If so the
   >   notes on the lower stave will occasionally overlap with those on
   the
   >   upper stave.  Are we supposed to read the lower stave an octave
   lower?
   >
   >
   >
   >   Hope I have made myself clear.
   >
   >
   >
   >   Monica
   >
   >   --
   >
   >
   > To get on or off this list see list information at
   > [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to