2011/3/3 Robert Norris <rw_nor...@hotmail.com>:
>
>
> Hopefully as you may have already seen my idea of version 1.2:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/viking/index.php?title=Roadmap_1.2

Since we released 1.0 (and also 1.1), we certainly have to discuss the
numbering scheme to use.

There is a lot of way to address this issue.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning

For 1.0, I tried to import the idea of "stable" release (I then
released 1.0.1 and 1.0.2). I don't know if it was usefull or not, nor
if viking is sort of software that need such effort. The main idea was
to use even releases as stable ones and odd releases for
developpements (like Linux AFAIK).

I also noticed that the numbering scheme based on using third digit
for bug fixes and second digit for enhancements is not easy: all
releases of viking contain both fixes and enhancements.

What's your opinion, prefered version numbering scheme?
-- 
Guilhem BONNEFILLE
-=- JID: gu...@im.apinc.org MSN: guilhem_bonnefi...@hotmail.com
-=- mailto:guilhem.bonnefi...@gmail.com
-=- http://nathguil.free.fr/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Viking-devel mailing list
Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel
Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/

Reply via email to