2011/3/3 Robert Norris <rw_nor...@hotmail.com>: > > > Hopefully as you may have already seen my idea of version 1.2: > > https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/viking/index.php?title=Roadmap_1.2
Since we released 1.0 (and also 1.1), we certainly have to discuss the numbering scheme to use. There is a lot of way to address this issue. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning For 1.0, I tried to import the idea of "stable" release (I then released 1.0.1 and 1.0.2). I don't know if it was usefull or not, nor if viking is sort of software that need such effort. The main idea was to use even releases as stable ones and odd releases for developpements (like Linux AFAIK). I also noticed that the numbering scheme based on using third digit for bug fixes and second digit for enhancements is not easy: all releases of viking contain both fixes and enhancements. What's your opinion, prefered version numbering scheme? -- Guilhem BONNEFILLE -=- JID: gu...@im.apinc.org MSN: guilhem_bonnefi...@hotmail.com -=- mailto:guilhem.bonnefi...@gmail.com -=- http://nathguil.free.fr/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Viking-devel mailing list Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/