> I noticed 1.1 was released, but it's labeled "pilot" rather than stable.
It's just a label I dreamt up for 'next' / 'latest' / 'bleeding edge', as like
a pilot TV program or a pilot science experiment.
The pilot term seemed sort of succinct and appropriate for software with
navigational aspects...
> But, I wonder if it works better than 1.0 for most users. Specfically,
> I am contemplating updating pkgsrc to 1.1.
> So, is a user who isn't paying attention to development issues better
> served by 1.1, or 1.0.2?
To my mind every git master HEAD update(s) should be near to being a user
'stable' release as possible.
Thus the formal tag 1.1 is the nearest.
A 1.2 release is imminent.
> (Also, there seems to be no tag for 1.0.2 in the repository.)
Good point.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Viking-devel mailing list
Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel
Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/
