Hello,
While working on a copy of Viking I've found few places in code that I
think may be improved. Can you please take a look?
1.
src/viktrwlayer.c:2193
g_array_index(dp->vtl->track_gc, GdkGC *, 11)
I think that the value '11' is invalid, because in my builds the
following message apears in terminal:
"(viking:3814): Gdk-CRITICAL **: IA__gdk_draw_arc: assertion 'GDK_IS_GC
(gc)' failed"
Since this line is supposed to draw a stop, perhaps
VIK_TRW_LAYER_TRACK_GC_STOP should be used instead.
2.
src/vikviewport.c:1641
vik_coord_load_from_utm ( &test, VIK_VIEWPORT_DRAWMODE_UTM, &u );
Strictly speaking the second argument to the function should be
VIK_COORD_UTM. Both names evaluate to zero, so this works.
3.
src/viktrwlayer.c:3324
GHashTable *vik_trw_layer_get_waypoints_iters ( VikTrwLayer *vtl )
{
return vtl->waypoints;
}
Shouldn't this function return vtl->waypoints_iters?
4.
src/viktrwlayer.c:2178
src/viktrwlayer.c:2365
if ( (!dp->one_zone && !dp->lat_lon) ...
Shouldn't these conditions for drawing a trackpoint and a waypoint be
the same? Currently they are not, second term of each condition is:
((!dp->one_zone) || tp->coord.utm_zone == dp->center->utm_zone)
vs.
( dp->lat_lon || wp->coord.utm_zone == dp->center->utm_zone )
From my understanding (!dp->one_zone) != dp->lat_lon.
Am I mistaken?
Best regards,
Kamil
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Viking-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel
Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/
