On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:28:52AM -0800, Marc Simpson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:09 AM Paul Fox <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > marc wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 9:20 AM Marc Simpson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > It looks like :show-marks (or :marks, :list-marks) erroneously > > > > displays '(none)' for buffers that have one or more marks. > > > > > > I only just noticed the most significant part of this problem: > > > > > > Named marks for [Named Marks] > > > (none) > > > > > > i.e., :marks is listing marks for its own buffer, not the buffer that > > > was being edited. > > > > > > > I think it's because the [Named Marks] buffer is current. If you > > switch back to your edit buffer, the [Named Marks] buffer updates > > correctly. > > Confirmed here too; thanks Paul. > > > So it seems like :show-marks buffer is being made current, > > when it shouldn't be. > > Agreed.
hmm - I probably should review the various commands which create buffers to see if there's other stuff to fix (or possibly add a mode to control the behavior). > Sidenote/related: It also looks like marks in the [Named Marks] buffer > are ignored, even though the "[Mark 'x' set]" is displayed. If this > is intentional, then perhaps that message should be suppressed or > changed. thanks (on my to-do list) -- Thomas E. Dickey <[email protected]> https://invisible-island.net ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
