On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 04:46:27PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > =========================================
> > >   Bug 2 : ^W-v bug still present
> > > =========================================
> > > 
> > > I already reported it, here is how to reproduce it:
> > > 
> > > 1. vim -u NONE -U NONE file_that_has_more_lines_than_your_term
> > > 2. <page-down>5j
> > > 3. ^W-v
> > > 
> > > the line that has the cursor in the left window goes as the first 
> > > visible line of the buffer, whereas it should not move. newly opened 
> > > window is ok though.
> > 
> > I don't see this problem.  Does it depend on the number of lines in the
> > file perhaps?
> 
> This type of problem happens to me all the time (when splitting buffers
> and/or opening new tab pages): the buffer scrolls up or down.
> 
> When I have, let's say, 6 lines in a buffer (scrolled all the way down,
> with only the last line showing); and I spliting vertically twice ^Wv
> ^Wv, when I return, the buffer has been scrolled.
> 
> Also I concur that the terminal size makes a difference.

     I can reproduce it, too.  I made a gnome-terminal window 91 x 45,
changed to vim70d/src, then

$ vim main.c
<Down>5j<C-W>v

and the cursor found itself at the top of the left-hand window, on the
same character as before.

HTH                                     --Benji Fisher

Reply via email to