M. Winn says below, "I think you are going to have to be removed from
the list manually."
I think so too, and have asked vim-owner to do so, but no one has
acted, apparently.
WILL SOMEONE PLEASE DO THIS SIMPLE ACT OF MAINTENANCE?
THANK YOU!
Eben Oldmixon
At 03:16 AM 4/13/2006, Matthew Winn wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:26:43PM -0400, Eben Oldmixon wrote:
> Here's the very top of the "blah-blah" (Eudora's term for it ...)
> material in the header:
> ===============
> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from mta30.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
> (mta30.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.101]) by mstr8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
> (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005))
> with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:15:51 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from foobar.math.fu-berlin.de
> (foobar.math.fu-berlin.de [160.45.45.151]) by mta30.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
> (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005))
> with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ORCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Wed,
> 12 Apr 2006 03:15:50 -0400 (EDT)
> ===============
>
> I do not know how to interpret email headers --- let me admit that up
> front. However, does that ORCPT term suggest something along the
> lines you mention? Note, though, that there is no other account
> involved now except for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Those headers look correct to me, so it does seem as though the mailing
list thinks your address is the one you're currently using. Oh well, it
was just an idea and it turned out to be wrong :-(
I think you're going to need to be removed from the list manually.
--
Matthew Winn ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.4/319 - Release Date: 4/19/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.4/319 - Release Date: 4/19/2006
