On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 at 9:58am, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote: > Hari Krishna Dara wrote: > > >The new version of netrw seems to be a lot better than the old explorer > >in terms of not corrupting jumplist, but I think there is more work > >needed. Ideally, when you open a directory, you should see only one > >new entry for each, and it should be in the natural order. What I am > >seeing right now is more than one, and it is even confusing. Also, if > >you open a couple of directories in sequence and try to get back to the > >original file using ^O, then the jumplist goes into a loop and you can > >never come back to the original file. If the directory is entered by > >means of pressing ^O, I think it should completely avoid modifying > >jumplist. > > > > > > > Hello! > > Please try setting g:netrw_fastbrowse=0 in your .vimrc. Hopefully the > jumplist will then be > retained. > > Regards, > Chip Campbell
Did you mean the value "2"? The value "0" didn't help so looked at the help and figured "2" might help and it did, as I can now ^O out of multiple directories. This is not ideal because I don't really want those directory buffers cached around, but can live with that for now. Are you planning to fix this problem? I looked at the code, and there are so many individual places the :keepjumps command is used, so don't know where else it needs to be prefixed. I was hoping we can just prefix the main functions/commands, but the help clearly says it won't work. -- Thanks, Hari __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
