Milan Berta wrote:
> I can still reproduce the wrong behavior of parens. Using vim7.0g.
[....]
> > > let l:fg=substitute(l:bcdefg,".*\\C" . l:cde . ",\\([^,]\\),.*","\\1","")
> > >
> > >
> > > It fails when the cursor is on
> > > - the first, the second of '('
> > > - the first '['
> > > - the last ')'
> > > - everything else is OK.
This is weird. With C syntax highlighting it works fine, with Vim
syntax highlighting it doesn't work properly. The highlighting is very
similar though. I don't see an obvious difference that causes the paren
matching to fail...
It apparently happens because the [ and ] don't have the same
highlighting. One is vimEscapeBrace and the other vimString. Thus it's
a problem in the Vim syntax. Almost any change makes it work, even
deleting the comma in [^,].
--
CRONE: Who sent you?
ARTHUR: The Knights Who Say GNU!
CRONE: Aaaagh! (she looks around in rear) No! We have no licenses here.
"Monty Python and the Holy editor wars" PYTHON (MONTY) SOFTWARE LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
