> My 2 cents - I highly dislike the "C-p/C-n use omnicompletion"
> thing.
I was suggesting it as an option in 'complete', probably not present
by default.
> The argument "I don't want to think about the completion I want" is
> moot. If you're writing something that requires omni-completion,
> you probably should be thinking.
One completion command to rule them all, is what I'm after :-)
Eg:
foo->ba
ba
At the end of the first line, when editing C, there's no reason I
would want any matches other than members of foo. At the end of the
second line I want to match anything. Doing the most sensible thing
in a given situation is what I propose. A user then only needs to
know one completion command and it will be right most of the time.
Rob.
--
Robert Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
MineSweeper3D - Take Minesweeper to a whole new dimension!
http://www.software3d.com/Mines3D
