Bill McCarthy wrote: > I looked at the release area and noticed that the vim70 tree > for Windows is still different from what is available by CVS > or SVN. This remains a minor inconvenience for Windows > users - either we use CVS (or SVN with its unix text files) > and copy over to a separate Windows tree OR we use patch > files that we need to modify to get rid of the "runtime/" > stuff where appropriate. > > Please consider putting these trees in sync in some future > release.
What tree? Please explain. If this is about missing the "runtime" directory: That's because on MS-Windows you can run Vim as-is, while on Unix you install it. Perhaps what we miss is "make install" for MS-Windows. Although I would recommend using Unix (any kind) for development above MS-Windows (e.g, why do we have one Makefile for all kinds of Unix and many Makefiles for MS-Windows). That's how Vim was setup. -- Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///