A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Can someone please try this out and confirm:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:18:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I mentioned this problem once on the list before; however, the issue
wasn't reproducible. Now I found a way to consistently reproduce it.
1. Open a new plain vim in a terminal.
2. ":h" to open a help window.
3. ":wincmd o" to close all other windows except the help window.
4. "G" to go to the last line.
5. "<c-e>" a few times (around 5) to scroll down.
6. ":tab split" to open a new tab.
7. ":tabclose" to close the new tab and return to the previous.
After all of this, the space generated by scrolling (via <c-e>)
disappears.
--Matt
I confirm it (as I already said at the time) but only with vim -u NONE.
It doesn't work with my usual vimrc. It _does_ work with gvim (or at
least with my current version of it). -N makes no difference.
P.S. "it works" in this context means "the procedure makes the bug
apparent". Trivial variations on the procedure, such as <F1> for ":help"
or ":only" for ":wincmd o", are irrelevant to the result.
I just retested it in vim+konsole and in gvim on Novell-SuSE Linux 9.3 with
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Jun 23 2006 22:12:23)
Included patches: 1-35
Compiled by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Huge version with GTK2-GNOME GUI. Features included (+) or not (-):
[...]
Best regards,
Tony.
