Bill McCarthy wrote:
> On Thu 14-Sep-06 6:35am -0600, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > Patch 7.0.106
>
> I encountered a problem that has appeared before patching
> files in "runtime". I received the following from my patch
> invocation:
>
> patching file `menu.vim'
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 2.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 885.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 912 (offset 2 lines).
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 942.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 1019.
> 4 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to menu.vim.rej
> patching file `src/version.c'
>
> I regularly update my local copy of vim with the following
> "copy update" command (4nt under WinXP):
>
> copy /u /s "ftp://ftp.home.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/dos/*"; c:\vim\vim70\
>
> I suspect your patches assume that users do not update their
> runtime files. Is this what's happening?
If you update your runtime files from the ftp site then you also get the
patches, eventually. Mixing patches and downloading doesn't always
work. In case of doubt use the files from the ftp site.
--
[Another hideous roar.]
BEDEVERE: That's it!
ARTHUR: What?
BEDEVERE: It's The Legendary Black Beast of Aaaaarrrrrrggghhh!
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
