A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
mwoehlke failed to read the previous post carefully:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Many FTP servers can be accessed read-only by HTTP; but most HTTP
servers have no FTP counterpart AFAIK.
"Many"? Like Victor, I would have said "most". [snip]
Please re-read what I said. "Many FTP servers can be accessed read-only
by HTTP" [snip]
Gack, you're right! Sorry! :-)
So I guess I'm just throwing my own $0.02 at the whole 'what's with the
assumption that ftp can be used to read http sites?' thing.
--
Matthew
"What's Cygwin?" you ask.
'Tis mostly absurd software
Concerning hippos.
