On 10/25/06, Peter Hodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Nikolai Weibull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I figured that it was easier to add items to a cluster using > containedin= for a syntax definition I'm writing, but it seems that > one can't do it that way. Is there a reason for this, or is it an > oversight? Can we add this to the todo? I've never needed it before, > but for this particular grammar, it made a lot of sense.
Using 'syn keyword SomeKeyword foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]' does not add SomeKeyword to the cluster @SomeCluster, rather, it allows SomeKeyword be contained in all the items in @SomeCluster.
Ah, of course. How silly of me. Although, it would be nice if this could be done somehow. A pair of @'s, perhaps, e.g., syn match Something containedin=@@Cluster '...'? nikolai
