A.J.Mechelynck wrote: > Ilya Sher wrote: >> A.J.Mechelynck wrote: >>> Alexey I. Froloff wrote: >>>> * Bram Moolenaar <Bram@> [061022 17:41]: >>>>> I don't want to support that, because it causes mistakes. Consider >>>>> being in Insert mode and typing "<Esc> o" to open a new line or >>>>> "<Esc> >>>>> n" to find the next match. A timeout won't help, the two keys can be >>>>> typed within ten msec. >>>> So, all plugins that imap something to Alt+Key a screwed up in >>>> all non-ascii 8-bit locales. Moreover, such maps breaks normal >>>> text entering. >>>> >>>> There is something outside your latin-1 world. Take a look >>>> around, you, 7-bit racists. >>>> >>> - Maybe Bram Moolenaar can type at 100 keystrokes / second, I can't. >>> Especially if one of the keys is <Esc>, which is far away from almost >>> everything else. >> Assuming one-handed typing, (especially for <Esc>o and <Esc>n) >> which is almost always not true for vim users. >> >> Assumption that people use keyboard mappings >> where <Esc> is far away is true most of the time >> but not always. (Common exception is caps lock >> generating <Esc>). >> >> >> [snip] >> > > When I say "I can't", I'm talking about me on my keyboard, where the > Esc key is at top left, and the nearest keys are (²³¬) (&1|) (é2@) and > F1 (Between round brackets: unshifted, with Shift, and with AltGr, in > that order, for a single key). > > I'm not assuming that _you_ cannot type 100 keystrokes per second, > though I would bet that the Vimmers who can are a minority at best. ;-) I was probably not clear enough.
The point is that one does not even have to type at that speed to hit pretty fast <Esc>o if the <Esc> is not far away and both hands are used. ... the first condition is optional. > > > Best regards, > Tony. -- For robots (please don't mail me there): [EMAIL PROTECTED] My real email is ilya @ same domain
