Hi Bram Moolenaar, you wrote: > > It sounds like keeping only 1024 bytes would already work for most > situations. That would be an acceptable amount to keep allocated at > all times. So why don't we use this as the initial size, and when it > grows larger we free it when finished. The growth size can be doubled > each time perhaps. >
I chose 8192/16384 pair because it's the closest to original 10000 bytes. 10000 itself would also be fine but I like round numbers... The patch with changes which, I think, close to what you describe above is attached. Could you please take a look at it? > > Right, this may happen and stack size wil greatly depend on the line > length. > ... > > That's very useful, thanks for diving into this. > My pleasure. -- Alexei Alexandrov
regexp-malloc.patch
Description: Binary data
