On 5/10/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Edward L Fox wrote: > I noticed that you also maintained another CVS repository besides the > sf.net's CVS repository. And many changes to that internal CVS won't > be applied to the sf.net's CVS repository unless a large release is to > be made. > > In my opinion, as the SVN repository is now standardized, could you > please give me the most bleeding-edge sources so that I can commit > them into the trunk/ directory of the SVN repository, and some users > who wish to use the unstable experimental version then can help you to > test the code. I don't know what you are talking about. The most recent version is the distributed archives plus the patches plus updated runtime files. In CVS is that minus runtime file updates.
So could you please give me the most recent runtime files? So I can upload them into the trunk/ directory and the users who want to try the newest version could try that by switching to trunk/. And vim7.1 branch will still sync with the CVS repository, as before.
There are a few changes on my local harddisk, but they are not in a patch yet for good reasons.
Maybe they can also be included in the trunk/. You see, a trunk/ doesn't need to be quite stable and bug free.
-- From "know your smileys": =):-) Uncle Sam /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
