On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, fREW wrote: > This reminds me, I think that our review window would be better in the > talk page, like on wikipedia. I am not saying that we should be like > wikipedia, as it's not a wiki as much as it is an encyclopedia. I > think that those review windows might be there for a long time and > that it would be good to not have them right on top of the tip. > Because people should be able to use the tips wiki in the meantime > even if we are still messing around with cleanup and stuff. > > What do you guys think?
Right, it is a bit offensive now. But I for my part don't use the Talk pages too often. I think it is something for experienced mediawiki-users. So i think many people wont find the notice there. Perhaps we could do it a bit less obtrusive: one or two lines, another color than "RED". What do you think? BTW: On my todo-list is a bot (some python-client that logs in to the wiki and does various stuff like cleanup, remove spam or similar) that collects information about the current state of the review process. Mathematically I want to collect (put in a specific category) all pages that are in Category "VimTip" but not in category "Review". Along that one could calculate a "progress" bar (like 23% done, or 123/500 Tips done) which would be especially nice for the core contributors, but also for the interested public. Sebastian. _______________________________________________ Vim-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/vim-l
