Hello,
John Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hermitte wrote:
> > it's true all the editing advices/guidelines
> > could be moved to the edit page
>
> Please no! If anyone has time to write a bot to reliably do this, your time
> would be better spent fixing something of significance. How about finding
> all the tips that broke during import due to a bar (|) character? Or broke
> due to something else? Or list all tips with --AT--, or titles with words
> like OPENBRACKET. These need fixing!
>
> If anyone wants to manually move some comments to the talk page, STOP! Just
> fix the comments where they are. Delete extraneous stuff. If a comment is
> not really helpful to the tip, delete it. Leave comments that are helpful or
> that you don't understand. Let someone else fix them later.
I was not referring to the TALK page, but to the EDIT page.
Indeed, I agree, we must not change all the talk pages for such things.
However, may be we could make the edit pages (all of them) detect there is a
{{review}} tag in the main page. If the tag is detected, then the edit page will
contain all the advices that are today on the main page.
As a result, with a {{review}} tag we could have :
1- a magenta box on the _main_ page that tells in 2-3 lines the page still needs
review
2- another magenta/yellow/whatever box in the _edit_ page that reminds us what
can be done.
(plus a magenta box in the _edit_ page that reminds us we forget to log in, if
anonymous.)
That's just an idea. First, I have to idea whether it is possible or not to
detect tags in the main page in order to display different things in the edit
page. Then, we have to think about it "seriously", I haven't myself yet. This
proposition is just an alterntive solution that reduce the size of the review
box of the unreviewed pages, but still keeps (elsewhere) the advices about how
review a tip.
--
Luc Hermitte
_______________________________________________
Vim-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/vim-l
