Olivier Teuliere wrote:
> Yes... but unfortunately there is a fair amount of tips where 
> the original indentation itself is quite bad :)

I don't use Vim's code formatting much (well never, actually), so I'm
totally ignorant of its capabilities. Can Vim format/indent Vim script?

>> Have you seen Heptite's monobook.js info at:
>> http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/User:Heptite
> 
> I have tried it, but when I click on the "ee" tab it starts 
> the download of a page containing something like this...

Ohh ... so it's not just me. It's on my "look at later" list.

> (or give the WikipediaFS a try)

I have played briefly with this. It's pretty clever, but I'm not sure that
it suits me. I can't remember exactly what my problem was. Two minor issues:
First, you need to work in a temp directory and copy the results over to the
WikipediaFS directory when done (I don't like working in a magic directory
where any file save is going to upload to the wiki). Second, after a long
editing session, my logon expired, and when I saved the file it was uploaded
as anonymous.

Also, I'm not sure how robust WikipediaFS is.

My script is pretty well finished (if it works for a sample of 10 tips, it
will work for all 1500 tips, right???).

> Do we really need to categorize all the non-tip pages as well?
> If so, what about a "Meta" category?

Seb has told me that "all pages must be in a category" and "all categories
must be underneath the Browse category". Seems a reasonable rule.

However, I see your point about the nuisance of working out a precise
category for everything, hence my suggestion to use the existing Help
category, which seems pretty appropriate (although Help has some generic
stuff in it). The Help category is for pages with wiki 'how to' info.

John

_______________________________________________
Vim-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/vim-l

Reply via email to