Hi, Sebastian Menge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Categories Options and Plugin are fairly empty, while Usage has many many > subcats.
For the moment, I was seeing Plugin as a placeholder category. In case some official plugins could use the wiki to have a "support" page. Other than that, I don't know what to do with this category. > I'd like to clean that up: > > e.g.: > > Usage > +-- Editing > +-- Extending > +-- Tuning > > And move the subcategories of Usage one level lower. Or make these three > toplevel. > > FYI: the vim user manual ist structured as follows: > > Getting Started > Editing Effectively > Tuning Vim > Making Vim Run > Reference manual > > > But I feel that this is not optimal. What do you think? Could we group > the subcats of Usage in a better way? I like "getting started". However I'm not sure sure this is pertinent regarding the numbers of tips. I really like "Tuning". It's a much better name that Options as it would encompass some other tips. But beware it does not become a Usage-bis filled with all the mappings and abbreviations vimmers can come with. I'm OK with Editing which could be subcategorized (but would be it be a good idea?) into A.T.I, Motions, Text Transformations, ... (There are several "Text transformations" related tips -- however, I don't really like this category. This is indeed what we do, but not necesserally a category in which we'd instinctivelly search tips.) I'm afraid that "Extending" is too fuzzy. For instance, all ftplugin related tips would be perfect candidates for extending. I'd need to have a look at the tips to see what would fit in this category. Otherwise, in the tips that still need to be categorized, I've seen quite a lot of tips related to buffers, windows, tabs, and files manipulations. Cheers, -- Luc Hermitte _______________________________________________ Vim-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/vim-l
