On 2006-04-07, Georg Dahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is this really the case? Or perhaps somebody has some new logos which
> > might be voted on?
>
> What about concrete suggestions? In order to vote for a new logo, there
> have to be logos to vote for.
Right. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." And certainly don't
change the logo simply because it hasn't been changed in a while.
But if someone has an idea for a logo that is truly "better" in some
sense, let's see it.
I like the current logo. It's clean and nice-looking. It's
readable so users unfamiliar with the logo can still tell what it
means. It scales well so that it's still recognizable and not muddy
as either a favicon or as a button in the Windows Quick Launch bar.
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wireless Division
| Spokane, Washington, USA
