I'm not sure I fully get what's going on, but I think is has to do
with the window that is automatically cloned to start the tab, which
is then converted to an empty buffer window.
On 5/15/06, Hari Krishna Dara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just wanted to send the script that I used, in case anyone is interested
to repeat:
let g:auCount = 0
aug TT
au!
au WinEnter * :call Au('WinEnter')
au WinLeave * :call Au('WinLeave')
au TabEnter * :call Au('TabEnter')
au TabLeave * :call Au('TabLeave')
au BufEnter * :call Au('BufEnter')
au BufLeave * :call Au('BufLeave')
aug END
function! Au(autype)
let g:auCount = g:auCount + 1
echomsg a:autype.' '.g:auCount
call input(a:autype)
endfunction
--
Thanks,
Hari
On Mon, 15 May 2006 at 5:08pm, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
>
> I am observing what might be inconsistency in the order in which vim
> fires autocommands. First, ovserving the order of buffer and window events,
>
> - Using :new:
>
> WinLeave
> WinEnter
> BufLeave
> BufEnter
>
> - Using :wincmd w
>
> BufLeave
> WinLeave
> WinEnter
> BufEnter
>
>
> When combined with tab operations,
>
> - Using, :tabe:
>
> WinLeave
> TabLeave
> TabEnter
> WinEnter
> BufLeave
> BufEnter
>
> - Using :tabnext:
>
> BufLeave
> WinLeave
> TabLeave
> WinEnter
> TabEnter
> BufEnter
>
> Extrapolating the first two, I was expecting these to be
>
> - For tabe:
>
> TabLeave
> TabEnter
> WinLeave
> WinEnter
> BufLeave
> BufEnter
>
> - For :tabnext:
>
> BufLeave
> WinLeave
> TabLeave
> TabEnter
> WinEnter
> BufEnter
>
> Is the existing behavior expected? Does anyone agree that it is
> inconsistent? I am even surprised that they should differ between
> switching between the existing windows/tabs and creating new ones.
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
