On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 08:27:00AM -0500, Tim Chase wrote: > >Unfortunately that still doesn't help the original poster, who > >wanted a way of getting to the character after the > in fewer > >than the three keystrokes taken to hit "w" three times. The > >only shorter sequence I can think of is "3w", unless this > >operation is required so frequently that a mapping of a > >function key to "f>l" would be worthwhile. > > My first reply included both "fH" and "f>", which are less than > the 3 keystrokes.
Not if you include the shift key. However, I think the best solution overall is the "f>" one, as it also copes with attributes on the element with no change in the command necessary. The fact that there's no think-time to use it outweighs the higher number of keystrokes, and it's faster to type f-shift-. than to visually count the number of words and then type that number plus "w". -- Matthew Winn ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
