Howard Jess wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Howard Jess wrote:
Sample output is:
Warning [flip.jss:7:10]: type mismatch:
conflict between boolean [flip.jss:4:19]
and string [flip.jss:7:10]
[ and more like that ]
which I think means:
set errorformat=%[^[][%f:%l:%v]%m
[ but that didn't work ]
What about
:set errorformat=%m[%f:%l:%v]%r
Sorry; I'm using Vim 6.3; it says:
E373: Unexpected %r in format string
Perhaps this is a new feature in 7.0??
hj
I dunno. I've junked 6.3 when 6.4 came around, and though I maintained
6.4 and 7.0 alpha in parallel, now that the 7.0 "release" is out (with
already 35 bugfixes) I've junked 6.4 too. Here's the paragraph about %r
in 'errorformat' in the 7.0 help (quickfix.txt fot Vim 7.0, last change
2006 Apr 30):
%r matches the "rest" of a single-line file message %O/P/Q
Maybe it isn't appropriate (%O, %P and %Q refer to how to handle
errorfiles where the filename is given once followed by several errors
with line/col without filename). Is it allowable to have %m more than
once in the format? Try
:set efm=%m[%f:%l:%v]%m
If it doesn't work, you could pre-process the errorfile so as to move
the [filename:123:45] part to the end of its line, and then match it
with %m[%f:%l:%v] on the modified errorfile. Vim could do the
preprocessing: (assuming the errorfile is called "make.log")
:new make.log
:1,$s/^\([^\[]*\)\(\[[^\]]*\]\)\(.*\)$/\1\3\2
:x
explanation:
1,$ from first to last line
s/ substitute from
^ start-of-line
\( start of subpart 1
[^\[] not a [
* repeated zero or more times (as many as possible)
\) end of subpart 1
\( start of subpart 2
\[ [
[^\]] not ]
* repeated zero or more times (as many as possible)
\] ]
\) end of subpart 2
\( start of subpart 3
.* zero or more of anything except a line break
\) end of subpart 3
$ end of line
/ replace by
\1 subpart 1
\3 subpart 3
\2 subpart 2
Lines (if any) where there is no [] bracket pair are left unchanged. If
there is more than one bracket pair in a line, the above moves the
_first_ [] block to the end of the line.
Disclaimer: This is UNTESTED. Maybe I made a typo. It wouldn't be the
first time ;-)
Best regards,
Tony.
