On Thursday 28 September 2006 12:58, you wrote: > > Perhaps, but there are still some nasty bugs in it. I must say I have no > much time and motivation to fix them as I thought that the integrated vim7 > spellchecker was a better alternative. > Tell me if I'm wrong (and why), I would perhaps change my mind (but I can't > do anything about my lack of free time to devote to vimspell).
Well. Probably the integrated spellchecker is better in many aspects, but if the integrated spellchecker cannot be configured to use ispell (which is the thing I asked for in my original post) it's almost useless for me. Imho it does not make sense to implement a spell checking feature which cannot take advantage of the existing spell checking systems. So.. I thought I just need to configure a few things to get teh new vim7 to use ispell as an external helper for the integrated spell checking feature. -- Regards Markus Vuori Software designer, System administrator PGP-avain: http://vuoret.net/markus/?p=pgp Skillnet Oy, http://www.skillnet.fi/ +358 14 445 1542 +358 50 408 8814
