On 4/26/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I go with the previous argument however: bdw has the inconvenient of including a "prepare step":bdw (move);(delete(word)) diw (delete((inner)word)) In my mental model, bdw is two steps, diw is one.
Not to mention that the repeat-command command . ignores motions before the operator you use. So diw is .able but bdw isn't. Shawn M Moore P.S. Tony: sorry for sending this to you twice.. I need to configure gmail to reply to all automatically -_-
