patch 9.1.1393: missing test for switching buffers and reusing curbuf

Commit: 
https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/31be82e66d412000f1d964a36bb8a03d40eaaeac
Author: Sean Dewar <6256228+seande...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date:   Thu May 15 19:59:37 2025 +0200

    patch 9.1.1393: missing test for switching buffers and reusing curbuf
    
    Problem:  The check in buf_freeall that restores curwin subtly prevents
              leaving an unloaded buffer in a window when reusing curbuf, if
              autocommands switch to a different buffer.
    Solution: Add a test case that covers this. Also ensure splitting isn't
              possible, as that could do the same (Sean Dewar)
    
    closes: #17325
    
    Signed-off-by: Sean Dewar <6256228+seande...@users.noreply.github.com>
    Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <c...@256bit.org>

diff --git a/src/buffer.c b/src/buffer.c
index 49ec77c7b..48e8cb63b 100644
--- a/src/buffer.c
+++ b/src/buffer.c
@@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ buf_freeall(buf_T *buf, int flags)
     // If the buffer was in curwin and the window has changed, go back to that
     // window, if it still exists.  This avoids that ":edit x" triggering a
     // "tabnext" BufUnload autocmd leaves a window behind without a buffer.
-    if (is_curwin && curwin != the_curwin &&  win_valid_any_tab(the_curwin))
+    if (is_curwin && curwin != the_curwin && win_valid_any_tab(the_curwin))
     {
        block_autocmds();
        goto_tabpage_win(the_curtab, the_curwin);
diff --git a/src/testdir/test_autocmd.vim b/src/testdir/test_autocmd.vim
index 26f714565..1988807f7 100644
--- a/src/testdir/test_autocmd.vim
+++ b/src/testdir/test_autocmd.vim
@@ -5415,4 +5415,31 @@ func Test_reuse_curbuf_leak()
   %bw!
 endfunc
 
+func Test_reuse_curbuf_switch()
+  edit asdf
+  let s:asdf_win = win_getid()
+  new
+  let other_buf = bufnr()
+  let other_win = win_getid()
+  augroup testing
+    autocmd!
+    autocmd BufUnload * ++once let s:triggered = 1
+          \| call assert_fails('split', 'E1159:')
+          \| call win_gotoid(s:asdf_win)
+  augroup END
+
+  " Check BufUnload changing curbuf does not cause buflist_new to create a new
+  " buffer while leaving "other_buf" unloaded in a window.
+  enew
+  call assert_equal(1, s:triggered)
+  call assert_equal(other_buf, bufnr())
+  call assert_equal(other_win, win_getid())
+  call assert_equal(1, win_findbuf(other_buf)->len())
+  call assert_equal(1, bufloaded(other_buf))
+
+  unlet! s:asdf_win s:triggered
+  call CleanUpTestAuGroup()
+  %bw!
+endfunc
+
 " vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab
diff --git a/src/version.c b/src/version.c
index e4651653b..ffcfccb2d 100644
--- a/src/version.c
+++ b/src/version.c
@@ -709,6 +709,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
 
 static int included_patches[] =
 {   /* Add new patch number below this line */
+/**/
+    1393,
 /**/
     1392,
 /**/

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/E1uFd6p-00CYWv-4Y%40256bit.org.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui