Per Hallsmark wrote:

> This is just a small request which will make it easier
> for source build environments to use vim tarballs.
> 
> Most opensource packages are named like "<proj>-<version>.tar.gz",
> or bz2 for that matter. After uncompress/untar, the top directory
> is similar to tarball without extensions "<proj>-<version>".
> 
> So in a Makefile that automates fetching and untar'ing of a source
> package, the process is simple.
> 
> Unfortunally, when uncompressing and untar'ing vim-7.1.tar.bz2
> it leaves me with a topdir named vim71. (haven't tried any other
> versions but strongly suspect they behave same ;-) )
> 
> Is it possible to have this reworked so that vim follows same
> scheme as about 99% of the rest of the world does? :)

A change like this will break existing build scripts.

I don't see how this different name can cause a problem.  Works fine for
the FreeBSD port, Debian, etc.

-- 
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
119. You are reading a book and look for the scroll bar to get to
     the next page.

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\        download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org        ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Raspunde prin e-mail lui