Dnia środa 12 wrzesień 2007, Andrew Myers napisał: > I think it's a great idea for Vim to be compliant with RFC 1345, but > that doesn't mean that it wouldn't make it a better editor to support > some additional digraphs not in the standard. Getting an RFC implemented > for new digraphs is a highly painful process. > > FYI, here are a few digraphs I had in mind:
You can always create script defining those digraphs and post it on vim-online. m. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
