Marc Haisenko wrote:
> On Thursday 10 January 2008, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > The reason you don't hear from me is that most of my emails to you > > bounce back. > > Ouch, that's bad... don't know why that happens. > > > What I tried to say: excluding /usr/local/[include|lib] is not specific > > for cross compiling. This should be a separate setting. Then it can > > also be set for cross compiling. > > Philip's patch is independent of mine, I think... the problem it addresses > just happened to bite him while cross-compiling. > > > Most configure features are explained in the Makefile. Or in the > > INSTALL file. I prefer the Makefile, there you can uncomment a line to > > have it used, no need to type it (configure doesn't warn for > > unrecognized arguments). > > What about the main "configure.in fixes for cross-compiling" patch by > me ? Is there anything I need to tweak so you can accept it or is > there some reason why you'd say the patch wouldn't be necessary ? When adding a new argument to configure it's always good to document this in the appropriate places. > Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't be mad if you'd declined it, I just want a > definitive "accepted" or "declined". I still need to look into this. Configure patches are always tricky. -- If "R" is Reverse, how come "D" is FORWARD? /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
