On 14/01/2008 21:43, George V. Reilly wrote: > On 14/01/2008, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Mike Williams wrote: >> >>> Catching up from the weekend patches I had two warnings for my builds. >>> The attached patch fixes them - done against 7.1.228 >> Thanks. >> >> I'm wondering if LONGLONG is always defined when WIN3264 is defined. We >> don't use LONGLONG yet anywhere. > > LONGLONG should be defined in all recent versions of the compiler and > SDK. Always as a 64-bit signed quantity. Recent = last six years or > so.
MS document the LARGE_INTEGER structure as being around since Win95, so I'd hope LONGLONG has been good for that long (excuse the pun) to. TTFN Mike -- Bragging: the pitter-patter of little feats. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
