On Jan 16, 2008 2:39 PM, Jürgen Krämer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> this is intended and documented behaviour. It's first mentioned below
> Have a look at the footnotes of this table (especially footnote (1)).

Argh, I totally missed that. Sorry for sending this mail in the first place :/

I could not find the actual rationale for this behaviour, though. Not that I
am trying to argue it, I am just interested in why this is. Possible
explanations would be

1) a good reason that has escaped me
2) a known caveat that is not urgent to handle as Dr Chip has a script,
   anyway


> The behaviour you want can be achieved with an additional script by
> Dr. Chip. You can download it from the following url

Thanks a lot :)


Richard

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Raspunde prin e-mail lui