On Jan 17, 10:07 pm, Mikolaj Machowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dnia Thursday 17 of January 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
>
> > Hello Vim users,
>
> > I have added two items to vote on:
>
> > - add collaborative editing: changes made to a file show up in another
> > Vim in a second
> > - add flexible tab stops, can be used for tables
>
> I'd like to see something simpler(?): better command line completion of
> built-in commands. You can script user defined commands as you wish to
> perform all magic but completion of many built-in commands is really
> dumb.
>
> For example I am working lately with "Tab Separated Values". When I try
> to insert Tab into regular expression of vimgrep Vim constantly tries to
> resolve it to file name. I have to resort to <C-V><C-I>.
I tend to agree, but would have argued the other way around.
Completing
with '^J' is useless in 99% of my standard use-cases. I believe,
ultimately
the completion should be configurable like for custom-commands. That
way everybody can have it the way he wants.
Is this becoming a wishlist ?
:b[dw][np] -- Delete/Wipe buffer and open next/previous one w/o
closing any
tabs/windows
Scanning the votelist, it appears that it is a bit inhomogeneous.
The topics range from 1-week to in-the-lifetime-achievement-class.
For some it is arguable, whether it's understood by "most people"
in the same way. Take this topic : Maybe "most people" assume,
that it would "naturally" include connections via the web and wouldn't
vote for it this wouldn't be the case.
Well, that's just a sidenote.
-ap
>
> m.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
