On 2/7/08, Tony Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This patch is meant to be applied "reversed" isn't it? (i.e., it was > generated > using "diff -c newfile oldfile" rather than the more common opposite > order) > > You're right, I did generate the patch backwards! I apologize for any inconvenience.
-- Erik Falor Registered Linux User #445632 http://counter.li.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
gvimext.patch
Description: Binary data
