Milan Vancura wrote: > I'm not sure how frequent is the usage of signs today, but if > they are to be used more frequently, new functions for > handling them (and using that functions in mksession) would > be a good idea (including a possibility to clear signs in one > file/buffer). Do you agree?
I don't use signs, but I took a quick look at the docs from interest. It does seem that more help from Vim would be good, like maintaining a script-accessible list of what signs are in use, and perhaps where (per-file). But then I wondered whether the system using the signs should maintain that intelligence itself. If I had some complex script adding signs, I should probably change signs with a single function, and that function should maintain its own list or dictionary with whatever information it wants. John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
