On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 1:25 AM, Joe Keen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you two having the same problem? > > > > There is a difference in the size_t and int type of the second argument. > > But the idea is that these lines are removed when the function prototype > > is in the header. Question is why that doesn't happen. I appear to > > have the same thing in the header file and it works for me. > > That is the problem I had before I installed the x-window-system-core > package in Debian. Commenting out the definition in osdefs.h did work > for me as well.
I think I got it. >From what I understood, osdef.h is generated by osdef.sh. At first, when I launched the compilation, I was missing some X headers (the xserver-xorg-dev package I think), and it seems that osdef.sh was executed at that point. Since it did not find the headers, it kept many definitions (including _Xmblen), and the compilation finally failed because of the missing headers. Then I installed them, and I think that osdef.sh was never executed after that, resulting in the conflict. I've just tried to execute it by hand, and it has generated an almost empty osdef.h this time. Maybe the script should be run each time compilation is started? BTW, I'm using aap for this. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
