On 23/04/08 18:00, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> On 23/04/08 17:40, fritzophrenic wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 17, 1:12 pm, fritzophrenic<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> See the vim_use
>>> thread:http://groups.google.com/group/vim_use/browse_thread/thread/863a0ce08...
>>>
>>> It seems that a nested first line only comment will incorrectly
>>> prepend the comment leader on the next line if it occurs in the middle
>>> of a multiline comment or in a single-line comment.
>>>
>>> For example, in a new buffer:
>>>
>>> :set tw=20 comments=ns1:/*,nmb:*,nex:*/,nfb:NOTES: fo=tcqr cindent
>>>
>>> Type:
>>>
>>> /* NOTES: mary had a little lamb */
>>>
>>> The comments wrap exactly as expected, i.e.
>>>
>>> /* NOTES: mary had a
>>> * little
>>> * lamb */
>>>
>>> Now type:
>>>
>>> /*<CR>NOTES: Mary had a little lamb */
>>>
>>> This gives:
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * NOTES: Mary had a
>>> * NOTES: little
>>> * NOTES: lamb */
>>>
>>> The same thing happens if you go into a pre-existing multiline comment
>>> and start typing. If the first-line-only comment is inserted on the
>>> first line of the multiline comment, it is fine. Otherwise, it fails.
>>>
>>> In addition:
>>>
>>> :set comments+=n://
>>>
>>> Type:
>>>
>>> // NOTES: mary had a little lamb
>>>
>>> to get:
>>>
>>> // NOTES: Mary had a
>>> // NOTES: little
>>> // NOTES: lamb
>>>
>>> I'm using gvim 7.1.293, 'Big' compile on MS Windows (I got it off the
>>> 'cream' sourceforge page).
>> Any comments on this? I'm pretty sure it is a bug, but if it isn't,
>> I'd certainly like to know why!
>
> /*
> * This is a three-piece comment
> * with start, middle and end:
> * a single comment starts at
> * slash-star and ends at star-slash
> */
>
> // This is a set of successive
> // single-line comments:
> // each double slash
> // starts a new comment,
> // which ends at the end of the line.
>
> NOTE: This kind of comment
> can be nested within
> the above two kinds.
> But nesting does not
> overlap.
>
> By "overlapping", I mean like brackets or HTML tags: ([]) is valid but
> ([)] isn't.
Maybe I should have said that ([)()()()(]) isn't; and I didn't address
the case of NOTES starting on the middle line of a three-piece comment.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Tony.
--
Here is the fact of the week, maybe even the fact of the
month. According to probably reliable sources, the Coca-Cola people
are experiencing severe marketing anxiety in China.
The words "Coca-Cola" translate into Chinese as either
(depending on the inflection) "wax-fattened mare" or "bite the wax
tadpole".
Bite the wax tadpole.
There is a sort of rough justice, is there not?
The trouble with this fact, as lovely as it is, is that it's
hard to get a whole column out of it. I'd like to teach the world to
bite a wax tadpole. Coke -- it's the real wax-fattened mare. Not bad,
but broad satiric vistas do not open up.
-- John Carrol, San Francisco Chronicle
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
