On Sun 11-May-08 9:14pm -0600, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > On 11/05/08 22:38, Bram Moolenaar wrote: >> Bill McCarthy wrote:
>>> My source is now patched through 298 but I haven't rebuilt >>> yet. The separate source with the floating point patch is >>> only at 293. >>> >>> I see the latest official runtime now has floating point in >>> the docs, yet the official patches don't appear to include >>> floating point yet. >>> >>> What's the plan? >> There are a few fixes for floating point in the pipeline. I'll send out >> an updated patch when I have included them. But I'm very busy the >> coming week, don't hold your breath. > In the meantime, you can apply the "official" patches even after the > "unofficial" patch for floating point, they will succeed (with a slight > fuzz in the case of version.c). My current Vim displays a ":version" > text as follows: Thanks for your note, Tony. I've updated my separate floating point tree of \src with 298 and applied Bram's patch (after removing the eval.txt portion), then John Beckett's patch to fix a few problems. The patch went fine - I believe the only adjustments made were to the Unix stuff (files with 'config' in the names) not needed for WinXP. Running fine. VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled May 12 2008 00:09:06) MS-Windows 32 bit GUI version with OLE support Included patches: 1-298 Compiled by Bill McCarthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (with FP) Big version with GUI. Features included (+) or not (-): ... +float ... -- Best regards, Bill --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
