> primary source: ftp.home.vim.org cd pub/vim > secondary sources: the cvs and svn repositories. both/either may lag > the ftp version by a bit. > purpose: for convenience >
I see. So, cvs and svn are effectively read-only - probably just a convenience for folks want to track the activity? I presume there's an uber-upstream source control system from which ftp.home.vim.org/pub/vim is derived then eh? Just curious - what is used at the top, and how do those changes propagate down to the cvs and svn repos? John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
