Philippe Fremy wrote:
> Hi Bram, > > What is the status of this patch ? Are you going to include it in gvim ? > As I said, it enteriely compiles out if you are not defining DEBUG or > NBDEBUG. But if you are, it's very useful to develop with the netbeans > interface. It's in the todo list at line 116. That is at 1%, so that's not bad :-). > > cheers, > > Philippe > > Philippe Fremy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I propose the following patch for the nebeans interface. > > > > It does: > > > > - add nbdebug statement for every error that might occur during the use > > of netbeans. Some annoying stuff was not logged, like a command not > > recognised by netbeans, or error only reported to the gui. > > > > - put more meaningful messages when a command applies on a netbeans > > buffer that is not found. Message was "null bufp in XXX". Now, it is > > "invalid buffer identifier in XXX". > > > > - allows netbeans stuff to compile when macro NBDEBUG is set. In current > > vim state, it simply does not compile. > > > > The patch was very helpful for me when debugging netbeans interactions. > > > > Note that all the nbdebug() statements are compiled out if NBDEBUG macro > > is not set (and by default, it is not set). So, it does not change > > anything to regular vim. > > > > > > cheers, > > > > Philippe -- Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how it remains so popular? /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
