On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:39 PM, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> One feedback: we should try to keep the patch numbers from Bram in the >> shortlog, shouldn't we ? > > *shrug* I went back and forth on that and ended up leaving it as is > since that's the way I started.
I managed to find a neat way to do this. >> My commit's dates are based on the ftp server: I guess a cleaner >> approach should be to scan the mailing list archives or copy the dates >> from cvs. > > I had thought about making git record the date as when the patch was > released but since that information isn't in the patch itself, gave up > on it. good hint. actually, it's inside each patch itself (just need to look for the date of version.c updates). > >> I'm consolidating the repo then I'll find a web server to host it. >> Thanks for the git address. > > Cool. I'm sure people will find a repo meant purely for replication > instead of my specific needs more useful. well, I know the pristine tar habits you have... I want to focus on vim+extra+all patches only. It's progressing well. Just cpu time mostly... -- Christian -- http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/, a linux distribution for Qemu with Git inside ! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
